From 3:27 to 2:39 in Three Years

From 3:27 to 2:39 in Three Years

When Michaela and I first started working together in January 2023, she just wanted to BQ again. Now we’re looking at an OTQ.

                                                             Photo: @jameswilsonshoots

 

Michaela came to me after 9 years of running and 13 marathons with a PR of 3:27. She was dedicated, she loved the sport, and she was ready to really believe in and invest in herself.

When I looked at the data from previous half marathons, speed workouts and the long runs she was doing for her past marathons, I quickly realized she already had the speed to run way faster than 3:27. Speed wasn’t the problem. The problem was that she couldn’t utilize the speed she had for a full marathon yet.

Often the instinct when you want to get faster is to keep doing faster intervals. More time at faster paces. But for Michaela, that would have been a waste of time. She didn’t need more of that short distance speed yet. She needed to learn how to sustain the speed she already had.

So while we did touch on some of that 5k-10k type speed, we made her threshold and marathon paced runs the priority. We made some of the threshold runs longer and I also gave her a variety of threshold workouts instead of doing the same one every week. We put a big emphasis on long runs with a lot of miles around what I thought her marathon pace should be based on some of her past interval and threshold runs.

There were never any big jumps in the length of those workouts. Just a gradual progression over a couple of months. But if you look at where she started versus where she finished, those small steps led to a huge change in the amount of work she could handle. By the end of that first cycle, she could handle a 15 mile progression run, broken up, starting above marathon pace and ending the last mile a touch faster, without feeling destroyed after. During these runs practicing exact race day fueling was also super important, not just for finishing the long run strong, but also for feeling better afterwards.

She went into her first Boston that April hoping to run around 3:19. She ran just under 3:02.

                                                              Photo: @jameswilsonshoots

 

 

She’s not running sub-2:40 now because we just kept doing the same thing that worked for that Boston build. If you’re reading this thinking, I already focused on my threshold and my long runs and it stopped working, that’s because you have to know when to change things up.

Over time we’ve changed what Michaela’s focus needed to be. There have been periods where we built her mileage. Periods where she focused on hills. Periods where she did 5k and 10k type training. Each block addressed something different because what she needed kept evolving as she got better.

That’s what long term development actually looks like. It’s not one magic training cycle. It’s a smart, evolving plan that keeps identifying the next thing to work on and then actually doing that thing instead of just doing more of everything.

If you’re reading this and something about Michaela’s story sounds familiar, like you feel that you have way more in you but aren’t sure what you need to change, it might be that you’re not focusing on the right type of speed workouts for you.

That’s something we address from day one in the Breakthrough Lab. The program comes with four training plans. Two are built for runners who have the stamina but need more speed. Two are built for runners who have the speed but need more stamina, which is exactly where Michaela was. From there, the course walks you through how to adjust the plan further based on your specific needs, and both Sage and I are in the community chat every week to help you figure things out. There’s also a monthly live call where you can bring your questions and your training data directly to us.

If you want to learn more, you can check out the Breakthrough Lab here or reach out to me directly at sandi.higherrunning@gmail.com. I’m happy to answer any questions.

-coach Sandi Nypaver

The Heart of Good Coaching

The Heart of Good Coaching

by Sandi Nypaver, Higher Running Co-Founder

Photo: Luke Webster

 

Good coaching isn’t just about having a lot of running knowledge. It’s about the ability to use all your knowledge and figure out how to apply it just right for each individual you are coaching. And most importantly, great coaching is about having genuine care for your athletes and their total well-being, not just their running results. That’s really the heart of it. If a coach is driven by a flexible job, rushing through work so they can do other things, a big audience/ego, and trying to make “easy money”, they’re going to be a crappy coach. And some will get away with it. But if genuine care is at the heart of everything a coach does, it’s going to make for some damn good coaching. Not only will athletes keep growing year after year, they’ll be able to honestly say that the coaching relationship had a positive, meaningful impact on their entire lives.

I started coaching all the way back in 2014. There have been a few instances in my life where I felt all I had to do was take a step forward and a path would magically appear. To me, it’s been a sign that I’m doing exactly what I’m supposed to be doing at that moment. That’s precisely how getting into coaching played out. I had a wonderful woman ask me to help her train for the Leadville 100 mile trail run and I knew coaching was what I was meant to do.

Learning about all things running, from physiology to mental performance to all kinds of training philosophies, is both a passion and an obsession. Even after taking numerous courses and reading hundreds of books, I still start most days by drinking coffee, eating breakfast, and reading about running. While I’m not always learning anything new material-wise, I often appreciate the refresher, a different way of saying something, and the opportunity to think analytically and creatively. Then there are also many days where I listen to a running podcast or go to bed reading about running, though at times I need a break to gain clarity about my own thoughts.

In today’s world, anyone can have knowledge. Not everyone knows what to do with it. When I consider everything I know about running, my mind often goes to the training principles that have stood the test of time. Gradual progression, lots of easy running, recovery to allow for adaptations, different training intensities throughout the year, the importance of a certain volume to be able to better withstand higher intensities, etc. But there are still countless ways to apply these things. While often I use the “least specific to most specific” approach for well-trained athletes (they’ve already developed a good aerobic base), even when people are training for the same races and aiming for around the same time, their training could look very different. And knowing how to adjust training and manipulate workouts for individual needs is still something that is often lacking in running books.

What I’m about to say may seem like an abrupt change and a little controversial to some, but bear with me, I’ll tie it back together. I genuinely love my athletes. Not the same way I love my family, and yes, they are paying me, but I love them. Some of my athletes I’ve been coaching for over a decade. I know what their kids are up to, I’ve seen a few go through tragic losses, they’ve trusted me with worries, and I’ve gotten to see them through their most joyous moments of running and life as well. I don’t take any of that lightly and my athletes know it. And I truly believe that when an athlete knows they’re cared for and that I genuinely care about their health, well-being and happiness, they are in a position to train and perform to the best of their abilities in whatever stage of life they are in.

Everything I’ve shared above is something I know every Higher Running coach can relate to. I’ll be the first to admit I have high standards when it comes to coaching, but because every single coach here genuinely cares about people and has a true passion for coaching, they appreciate the standard of coaching we expect here at Higher Running. Each coach also has a small athlete roster, so that level of care can always be maintained. And I believe that’s why all of our coaches have many athletes they’ve worked with for years and why we often fill up, even in an era where there are hundreds of run coaches and companies to choose from. Higher Running was founded on passion for running and genuine care for people, and that will forever be our compass.

You’re within 5 minutes of a sub-3 hour marathon.

What’s actually holding you back from sub-3?

For some runners, more volume can be very beneficial. For others, the main limiter is threshold fitness or raw speed. It comes down to knowing what’s holding you back. If your 5k-10k PRs are better than your marathon PR (i.e. you’re an 18 min 5k runner or faster) things that might help are more long runs with marathon paced work, a mileage increase, and/or more threshold runs.

Here are some threshold workout examples:

  • 2 x 3 miles (2-3 min easy) at threshold pace (~6:42-6:34 min/mile, 4:10-4:05min/km)

  • 10-12 x 3 min (1 min easy) at ~4-8s faster than threshold pace

  • 2miles -2 miles -2 miles -1 mile (2-3 min easy) at threshold pace, or do a progression starting a little over threshold pace and ending the mile a little under.

However, before you start marathon training or in the first phase of training for a marathon, you’ll want to focus on faster, shorter workouts. This could be everything from 12 second to 1 minute hill reps, to 200s, and 3-4 min intervals at VO2 max pace. Then even as you get more into marathon specific training, you can still add in more touches of speed without running yourself into the ground.

These are some specific ideas:

  • 8 x 30s (1 min easy) or 5-6 x 1 min fast (1 min easy) after the end of a threshold run

  • 10 x 800m (1-1.5 min easy) at ~10k pace

But what if you’re already in your final 8 weeks of marathon training?

If you’re in your final 8 weeks, the goal shifts. You’re not trying to close the gap, you’re building fitness and getting comfortable at sub-3 pace.This could look like 4 x 3-4 miles at current marathon fitness pace builds the endurance and strength to hold your pace on race day. Or, 10 x 1 mile at 6:52/mi (4:16/km) gets you touches of sub-3 pace in your long runs without overdoing it, while still supporting your current marathon fitness.

Strength Training: The Flossing of Running?

Strength Training: The Flossing of Running?

We know, we know. Being told to incorporate strength training into your running is a bit like your dentist telling you to floss.

You already know it’s good for you. You already know you should be doing it. And yet… it’s usually the first thing to get skipped when life, mileage, or fatigue pile up.

Over the years, Coach Sandi Nypaver has seen enough patterns, both in her own training and in the athletes she coaches, to be convinced that strength training isn’t just “nice to have” for runners. It’s foundational. The trick is doing the right kind, at the right time, and for the right reasons.

Where Do You Even Start?

Saying “all runners should strength train” is easy. Executing it well is harder.

Before you load anything, bodyweight, bands, or external weight, you need the ability to move correctly. That means activating the right muscles and having enough mobility to actually access them. If you can’t hinge, stabilize, or rotate properly, strength work tends to reinforce compensation rather than fix it.

When I first started working with a strength coach, nearly the entire first month was foam rolling, lacrosse ball work, and mobility drills. No heavy lifting. No flashy exercises. And I was sore because I was suddenly able to use muscles that had been underperforming for years. That foundation changed everything that came after it.

What’s the “Best” Type of Strength Training for Runners?

There are plenty of effective approaches, but for most runners, especially those balancing volume, intensity, and real life, core strength consistently delivers the biggest return.

Core doesn’t just mean abs. It’s your glutes, hamstrings, obliques, lower back, and deep stabilizers. These muscles are central to posture, force transfer, and efficiency.

The good news: core work is practical. It can be done at home, requires minimal equipment, and doesn’t need to be long to be effective. The key isn’t novelty or complexity. It’s correct execution and consistency.

Many of my athletes rotate between two or three short routines. A handful of exercises done well, repeatedly, will do far more for your running than a long session where you’re just checking boxes.

Why It Actually Matters

Well-designed strength training can improve running economy by increasing muscle fiber recruitment and improving rate of force development. In simple terms: you get more output for the same effort.

It also helps maintain muscle mass and bone density, which becomes increasingly important as you age. And yes, it can reduce injury risk, but only if it’s done correctly. Poor form or poor muscle activation can reinforce faulty mechanics and create new problems instead of solving old ones.

Making Strength Transfer to Your Running

One common frustration: you get stronger in the gym, but it doesn’t automatically show up in your running.

Strength gains don’t transfer on their own, because you have to teach your body how to use them. That’s where activation exercises, drills, and intentional focus during runs come in.

Activation work before a run helps you feel the muscles you want to utilize better. During the run, make a conscious effort to tap into those same sensations. You won’t feel them firing as intensely as during strength work, but they should be present.

That’s how strength stops being something you do around running and starts becoming something that actively makes you a stronger, faster, more durable runner.

You paid for coaching. But you were still guessing.

In the past few years we’ve had runners come to us who were unsure whether coaching was really working for them.

They liked the idea of having a coach.
They invested in it financially.
But over time, something felt off.

They weren’t always sure how closely their workouts were being reviewed. They weren’t given clear pace ranges or guidance that reflected their current fitness. Feedback felt surface level or wasn’t there at all. There was no guidance on pacing, mindset strategies, or building a race day plan. Importantly, they never really understood why they were doing what they were doing.

There was no sense of a longer arc.
No conversation about how this training cycle fit into the next one.
No evidence that their coach truly knew them as an individual runner rather than one name on a long roster.

When that happens, it doesn’t just affect results.
It creates doubt.

Runners start questioning their training and wonder if they should just go back to guessing on their own. They worry about wasting more good training years by choosing wrong again.

That confusion is reasonable.

Thoughtful coaching is not about how many athletes someone has or large social media accounts.

It means engaging with your data and your feedback.
It means explaining decisions so you can learn and build confidence in the process.
It means planning with your long term development in mind, not just your next race.

If you still care about improving, staying healthy, and understanding your training, that hasn’t gone away. What you’re really looking for is a coaching relationship built on trust, communication, and individual attention.

Here’s a few things we’ve heard recently:

“This coaching experience is already so much better than I thought it was going to be.”
“I can tell you actually care, not just about my training, but about me.”
“You actually know how to coach. You’re not just giving me a custom schedule.”
“The advice you gave me was priceless. Good coaching is so much more than just a plan on paper. It’s shared wisdom, words, experience. I toed the line in such a good headspace this morning.”

Thoughtful coaching means engaging with your data and your context.
It means explaining decisions so you can learn and trust the process.
It means thinking beyond one race and toward who you’re becoming as a runner.
It means staying curious, continuing to learn, and approaching each athlete with individual attention.

If a previous experience made you question whether coaching is worth it, that hesitation is reasonable.

But we want to tell you that we care. And we combine that care with experience, expertise and a true love for wanting to help people reach their running goals while truly enjoying the process.

You’re probably misunderstanding Zone 2

You’re probably misunderstanding Zone 2

Zone 2 training has become one of the most discussed concepts in endurance running, and for good reason. Easy aerobic running is foundational.

But when runners say, “I trained in Zone 2 for a year and didn’t improve,” the issue is rarely a lack of patience or discipline. It’s usually a misunderstanding of how Zone 2 fits into the larger training picture.

Easy running supports aerobic development and plays an important role in building tissue resilience and durability. It allows adaptations to accumulate through repeatable, recoverable training.

For many runners, “Zone 2” aligns with easy, conversational running. But for higher-level athletes, spending too much time near the top of that range can quietly turn easy days into moderate ones and interfere with recovery.

What easy running does not do particularly well on its own is prepare you for the demands of racing.

Race performance depends on more than aerobic capacity. It requires efficiency at faster speeds, tolerance for higher metabolic stress, and the ability to coordinate force under fatigue. Those qualities are trained through targeted exposure to higher intensities.

That doesn’t mean hard workouts year round. It means that at some point in a training cycle, most runners benefit from introducing small, intentional doses of faster running. This can include strides, tempo or threshold work, and occasional VO₂max efforts. Each serves a different purpose, and together they complement the foundation built by easy mileage.

Easy miles make harder training possible.

Harder training makes fitness specific.

Where easy running matters most is when you’re building the ability to train.

If you’re newer to running, returning from time off, or rebuilding mileage, keeping most runs easy while gradually increasing volume is exactly the right focus. At this stage, easy running strengthens muscles and connective tissue, improves coordination, and raises tolerance for frequency and consistency.

But when weekly mileage is very low, easy running alone may not provide enough total stimulus to drive meaningful performance improvements, particularly for longer events like the half marathon and above. In those cases, progress often comes from a combination of consistency, gradual volume increases, and complementary stress such as short intensity work, strength training, or cross training.

The goal isn’t to rush fitness. It’s to expand what your body can handle sustainably.

The real value of Zone 2 isn’t that it’s a special or optimal pace. It’s that it allows you to train more, more often, without breaking down. By keeping mechanical, metabolic, and nervous system stress low, easy running makes recovery and repeatability possible.

That consistency is where long term fitness compounds.

As weekly volume becomes more sustainable, easy mileage creates room for quality work to actually do its job. Zone 2 isn’t about chasing a number or a philosophy. It’s about building training you can repeat week after week.